Getting your site not to look like drupal

Session Description

Have you ever visited a website that immediately appeared to be made with Drupal? There’s of course the multitude of blogs with a minimally modified Garland or Bluemarine theme, but even beyond the obvious, there are many signs that give users a feeling of déjà-vu. It’s not that there is anything wrong with Drupal, but sometimes you really need to make your website stand out and there are two things you need to have: an original design and original functionality.

There is no magic recipe for a successful website; what we are going to show you is how themers and developers can work together to make a website look and behave the way you (or your client) wants it to. All of this is done in a clean way through the many interfaces that Drupal provides, we won’t modify existing modules, so we’ll keep the full benefits of a clear update path as well as community support.

Session Presenter: Florian Loretan
Presenter Info
I have used Drupal for the past two years to build websites and online applications for small companies and non-profit organisations, using a variety of contributed and custom modules and themes. I do all of my work with open-source software, so using Drupal was really a logical choice for me. I moved to San Diego in August 2007 to work as a full time drupal developer for Achieve Internet.
You must be logged in to vote on sessions.
Session Discussion:

My notes

Here’s a dump of my notes from this session – some repeat with my previous “clean CSS” post:
Drupal Theming

Use a theme that has 0 styles

  • Don’t customize Garland
  • Keep default.css, system.css, etc, but no theme styles

All design images should be background images
(Good for mobile porting)

Clean / empty themes (my research, not from the presentation)?

Drupal Theming Links

This is my compilation of links that came up during the “Getting your site to no look like Drupal”

Unstyled or near-blank themes:

(Also, see the basic layout chart for Zen: http://drupal.org/node/122550#comment-227903 )

Syndicate content